198 certified filings with a worksite in this city · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Reported wages are what employers filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Filings are counted by worksite, so a company headquartered elsewhere appears here if the job is here.
FY2025 median across the 41 filings that reported a wage for a worksite in Olive Branch, MS — of 198 certified filings in total. DOL LCA · FY2025
| Fiscal year | Filed wage | Wage sample (n) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 (through Q3) | $97,386 median of 21 | 21 |
| FY2025 | $111,238 median of 41 | 41 |
| FY2024 | $93,983 median of 38 | 38 |
| FY2023 | $84,531 median of 24 | 24 |
| FY2022 | $90,050 median of 34 | 34 |
| FY2021 | $77,405 median of 40 | 40 |
How these wages are computed · All cities · All job titles
Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 · Basis worksite city as filed; median not average
Filings from Olive Branch, MS fall inside the federal statistical area MEMPHIS, TN-MS-AR. That area is larger than this city — it spans several cities and, where the name says so, more than one state. Everything on this page is computed from filings whose worksite city is Olive Branch itself, so the numbers above are city figures, not area figures.
| Employer | Filed wage | Wage sample (n) |
|---|---|---|
| Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | $82,451 median of 22 | 22 |
| Amplify Cell Technologies LLC | $112,653 median of 15 | 15 |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corp | $70,325 median of 13 | 13 |
| Prolifics, Inc. | $90,126 median of 12 | 12 |
| View Operating Corporation | $101,472 median of 12 | 12 |
| Kforce Inc. | $91,416 median of 10 | 10 |
| Nisum Technologies Inc. | 8 filings — too few for a median | 8 |
| DMC Power LLC Fewer than 10 certified filings, so this employer does not have its own page. | 7 filings — too few for a median | 7 |
| Amazon | 6 filings — too few for a median | 6 |
| Ernst & Young U.S. LLP | 4 filings — too few for a median | 4 |
| Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC Fewer than 10 certified filings, so this employer does not have its own page. | 3 filings — too few for a median | 3 |
| 3S Business Corporation | 3 filings — too few for a median | 3 |
| Computek Solutions Inc. | 3 filings — too few for a median | 3 |
| View, Inc. | 3 filings — too few for a median | 3 |
| Sephora USA, Inc. | 3 filings — too few for a median | 3 |
| Rays Technical Solutions Inc | 3 filings — too few for a median | 3 |
| Cbre, Inc. | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
| MI Softech, Inc | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
| Conversantit Inc | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
| Kenco Logistic Services LLC | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
| Zimmer Biomet Spine, Inc. | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
| Sai Technologies, LLC. | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
| Tech Mahindra (Americas), Inc | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
| Canamex-Carbra Transportation Services LLC Fewer than 10 certified filings, so this employer does not have its own page. | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
| Hunter Trading Company, LLC Fewer than 10 certified filings, so this employer does not have its own page. | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
Ranked by number of filings, not by pay and not by quality. This is not a “best employers” list. Employers with fewer than 10 filings here show the count only. 72 employers in total filed for a worksite in Olive Branch; the 25 above are those with the most filings. Those with at least 10 certified filings have their own page; the rest are counted here but do not.
Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis worksite city as filed; counted across the whole coverage period, not one year
We build a page for a city once it has at least 50 certified filings — 2,578 cities qualify, and 2,298 of those also clear our content threshold and are listed in the city index. Below the filing threshold we do not publish a median, because a median from a small number of filings reads like a market rate and is not one. Those filings are still counted on their employer's page.