The Sponsor File

American Specialty Health Incorporated

Filing address: Carmel, INworksites: CA, IN, TX, SC, GA (5 of 17 states)

  1. Change-of-employer denials
    0 of 18
    USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined · n = 18 decided
    18 approved, 0 denied. Too few for a rate.
  2. Median filed wage
    $120,511
    DOL LCA · FY2025 · n = 21 certified
  3. Green-card (PERM) filings
    29
    DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
  4. Layoff notices (WARN)
    No CA records
    State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24
    Worksites in IN, TX, SC, GA, MN and 11 other states — not covered.

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

Across FY2021–FY2025 combined, USCIS decided 18 change-of-employer petitions filed by this employer: 18 approved, 0 denied. That is fewer than 20, which is too few to state a denial rate, so we show the counts instead.

The table below splits petitions by filing type, over FY2021–FY2025 combined. The types do not face the same odds — find the row that matches your own situation.

All figures in this table are FY2021–FY2025 combined totals.
Filing typeApprovedDeniednDenied share
Change of employerYou move from another company to this one1801818 decisions
New employmentFirst-time H-1B — subject to the annual lottery1301313 decisions
ContinuationExtending an H-1B you already hold here8088 decisions
AmendedA change at the same employer191205%
Change with same employerNew role, same employer291303%
New concurrentA second, simultaneous H-1B2022 decisions

Where fewer than 20 petitions were decided we print the count instead of a percentage. A percentage drawn from a handful of cases reads like a probability, and it is not one. How the sample thresholds are set.

Year by year, change-of-employer petitions only. The headline above combines the FY2021–FY2025 rows of this table (marked in window); the other years are shown because the denial climate in earlier years was not the same one.

Change of employer, by fiscal year.
Fiscal yearApprovedDeniednDenied shareWindow
FY2026 (through Q3)1011 decision
FY20251011 decisionin window
FY20242022 decisionsin window
FY20233033 decisionsin window
FY20227077 decisionsin window
FY20215055 decisionsin window
FY20202022 decisions
FY20193033 decisions
FY20188088 decisions
FY20176066 decisions
FY20161011 decision
FY2015000
FY20143033 decisions
FY20132022 decisions
FY2012000
FY2011000

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Headline window FY2021–FY2025 combined · Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.
Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

Why 5 years combined, and why these 5?

A single year of one employer's petitions is often a handful of cases, and a percentage drawn from a handful reads like a probability. Combining fiscal years raises the count — but only if the years belong to the same period. Across all employers in our data, the share of change-of-employer petitions denied ran at 9.54% in FY2018, 9.42% in FY2019 and 4.99% in FY2020, and has stayed between 1.28% and 1.99% in every one of the 5 years from FY2021 through FY2025. Averaging the earlier years together with FY2025 would not produce a steadier estimate; it would produce a number that describes no period at all. So the window stops where the earlier adjudication climate begins, and every figure drawn from it is labelled with the years it covers.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
$120,511
n = 21certified filings

FY2025 median, from 21 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2025

Fiscal yearFiled wageFilings (n)CertifiedWithdrawnDenied
FY2026 (through Q3)$114,282 · median of 14141440
FY2025$120,511 · median of 21212110
FY2024$120,255 · median of 20202040
FY2023$102,312 · median of 14141460
FY2022$90,226 · median of 24242430
FY2021$82,721 · median of 16161621

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

Pay for this company’s largest job title

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Only this job title has enough filings to break out — 10 certified filings is the threshold, and this employer's other 2 titles are below it.

Job titleFiled wageWage sample (n)
Software Engineer
across 2 seniority levels: $110,409 – $132,500
By seniority (6)

Senior: $132,500 · median of 14
(unstated): $110,409 · median of 12
Level 2: 6 filings — too few for a median
Level 1: 5 filings — too few for a median
Associate: 3 filings — too few for a median
Staff: $173,394 · 1 filing

$108,370
median of 41
41
Data Engineer
By seniority (4)

Level 2: 3 filings — too few for a median
(unstated): 2 filings — too few for a median
Senior: 2 filings — too few for a median
Level 1: $80,000 · 1 filing


8 filings — too few for a median
8
Devops Engineer
By seniority (1)

Level 2: 2 filings — too few for a median


2 filings — too few for a median
2

Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Wages are medians of certified filings; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Basis certified filings with a stated wage; medians, not averages

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+12.9%
n = 109certified filings

Filed wages sit 12.9% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filedFilings (n)Filed wagePrevailing wageDifference
Level I22$91,987 · median of 22$74,724 · median of 22+23.1%
Level II46$97,749 · median of 46$88,504 · median of 46+10.4%
Level III14$127,500 · median of 14$115,939 · median of 14+10%
Level IV88 filings — too few for a median8 filings — too few for a median
Not stated on the filing19$118,657 · median of 19$103,034 · median of 19+15.2%

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Yes — PERM filings on record

29 permanent labor certification applications were decided across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 10 of them in FY2026 (through Q3).

Fiscal yearCertifiedCertified-expiredDeniedWithdrawnTotal
FY2026 (through Q3)640010
FY202511002
FY202431004
FY202321003
FY202224017
FY202130003

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices
No California WARN notices on record for this employer (2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24). That part is a real zero, not missing data. But this employer also has worksites in IN, TX, SC, GA, MN, and we have not loaded those states — layoffs there would not show up here.

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This page combines 5 filing names

how we grouped them

One company files under many spellings and many legal entities. We combine them so the numbers above cover the whole company rather than one spelling of it — and we list what we combined, so you can check the grouping instead of taking our word for it.

Show the filing names behind this page
Name as filedFEIN (last 4)Filings
American Specialty Health Incorporated3241127
American Specialty Health Inc.32413

Showing the 2 most common of 5 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else American Specialty Health Incorporated appears on this site

by filing volume

Places. It is among the top filers in Carmel, IN, Greenwood, IN and Poway, CA. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in IN with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

Bluesky Technology Partners Inc (9) · Brainlabs USA, LLC (9) · C&R Racing, Inc. (9) · Calumet GP, LLC (9) · Core BTS, Inc. (9) · dormakaba USA Inc. (9) · Esense, Inc. (9) · Global Preparatory Academy, Inc. (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in IN are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.