Filing address: Santa Clara, CAworksites: CA, TX, MA, MT, NC (5 of 7 states)
Historical filed wages are not verified amounts paid to workers. USCIS decisions do not estimate an individual petition’s outcome. Current sponsorship for a particular role is not verified here. One LCA is not one job.
This record uses the filing name shown above; grouping may differ across sources. The record does not establish which legal entity would employ or petition for you.
Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.
Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method ·
The source reports separate application categories. We keep them separate and use change-of-employer decisions for the headline, rather than blend different categories. These historical categories do not determine the process or outcome for a current role.
FY2023 median, from 20 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2023
| Fiscal year | Filed wage | Wage sample (n) | Certified | Withdrawn | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | $125,463 · median of 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | $130,761 · median of 40 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method · Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed
Filed wages exclude bonuses and equity and do not confirm actual pay. DOL LCA Denied counts are not USCIS petition decisions.
These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.
A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.
| Job title | Filed wage | Wage sample (n) |
|---|---|---|
Software EngineerBy seniority (1)(unstated): 7 filings — too few for a median | 7 filings — too few for a median | 7 |
Financial AnalystBy seniority (1)(unstated): 3 filings — too few for a median | 3 filings — too few for a median | 3 |
Electrical EngineerBy seniority (1)(unstated): 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 filings — too few for a median | 2 |
Industrial EngineerBy seniority (1)(unstated): $135,000 · 1 filing | $135,000 1 filing | 1 |
Qa EngineerBy seniority (1)(unstated): $87,000 · 1 filing | $87,000 1 filing | 1 |
Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Reported wages are from LCA filings, not verified amounts paid to workers. Each value is labeled as a single filing, a median with its sample size, or a withheld small sample; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.
Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method · Basis certified filings with a stated wage; single-file values or medians above the sample threshold; not averages
Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how its filed wage compares with that reference. These are historical filings, not verified offers.
Filed wages sit 9.8% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.
| Wage tier as filed | Filings (n) | Filed wage | Prevailing wage | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level II | 21 | $111,300 · median of 21 | $96,387 · median of 21 | +15.5% |
| Level III | 21 | $134,493 · median of 21 | $122,408 · median of 21 | +9.9% |
| Level IV | 9 | 9 filings — too few for a median | 9 filings — too few for a median | — |
| Not stated on the filing | 9 | 9 filings — too few for a median | 9 filings — too few for a median | — |
Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method · Basis certified filings only; single-file values or medians above the sample threshold; not averages
PERM records do not establish current employer policy or an individual’s green-card outcome. Certified-expired is kept separate from Denied.
1 permanent labor certification record is present across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 1 of which in FY2025.
| Fiscal year | Certified | Certified-expired | Denied | Withdrawn | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method
Certified-expired is a status recorded in the PERM source files. We show it separately from certified, denied and withdrawn. These aggregate records do not establish whether a later immigration filing was made, why a record has this status, or whether an individual received a green card.
Source State WARN layoff notices ·Coverage CA · 2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24 ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method
Applied Material, Inc.
https://thesponsorfile.com/employer/applied-material-inc
These questions are prompted by the historical records and data gaps on this page. They are not conclusions about current policy or advice about an individual case.
To print this checklist, choose Print in your browser’s menu. Only this checklist and its evidence will print. No answers are collected or saved here.
Observed on this page: Applied Material, Inc. is the page display name. 1 filing-name variant is grouped here. Page scope: grouped filing names; source matching may differ. No group relationship is recorded here; independence is not verified. The future employing or petitioning legal entity is not verified.
Ask the employer: Which legal entity would employ me and file any petition for this role? How does it relate to the filing names shown here?
Evidence: https://thesponsorfile.com/employer/applied-material-inc#record-scope
Observed on this page: FY2023: $125,463; n=20 filings with a wage; median of 20. Certified filings with valid annualized wages. Employer-wide filing samples can differ in role, level and location; this is not a like-for-like offer comparison. Filed wages are not verified pay or total compensation.
Ask the employer: What base pay, job title, level and work location are specified for this role, and how do they relate to the historical filings shown here?
See records: Pay and work location
Evidence: https://thesponsorfile.com/employer/applied-material-inc#wages
Observed on this page: No matched change-of-employer decisions in FY2021–FY2025 combined; other petition types or years may be shown separately.
Ask the employer: Can you confirm whether sponsorship is offered for this specific role and which legal entity and petition category would be used?
See records: Current petition policy
Evidence: https://thesponsorfile.com/employer/applied-material-inc#outcomes
Observed on this page: 1 matched PERM records across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3). n=1 source records across all covered years. This is not a count of green cards issued.
Ask the employer: What is the employer’s current policy for starting an employment-based permanent-residence process for this role, and which entity would handle it? Historical PERM records do not confirm a commitment for this role.
See records: Current permanent-residence policy
Evidence: https://thesponsorfile.com/employer/applied-material-inc#perm
Observed on this page: No matching WARN records found in CA; CA · 2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24. We have not matched records to this employer in the loaded sources. Loaded states: CA. Worksite states not loaded: TX, MA, MT, NC, NJ, VA. Source observations may include different locations or revisions, not independent events or unique people. Entity matching may be incomplete; this does not establish that no notices were filed or no changes occurred.
Ask the employer: Can you clarify any announced staffing or worksite changes relevant to this role? This page’s WARN coverage cannot establish that no changes occurred.
See records: Current team and worksite changes
Evidence: https://thesponsorfile.com/employer/applied-material-inc#warn
Current sponsorship, pay, hiring plans and policy for a specific role remain unverified. Loaded dates identify our data version, not a human review date. For advice on an individual immigration case, consult a qualified professional.
Places. It is among the top filers in Gloucester, MA. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.
These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.
Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.
These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".
11x AI Inc. (9) · ABC Technologies California, LLC (9) · Accurate Engineering, Inc. (9) · Achievekids (9) · Acies Engineering, Inc. (9) · ACORE Capital Mortgage, LP. (9) · Acquest law Inc. (9) · Adicet Bio, Inc. (9)
Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in CA are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.