The Sponsor File

Fiserv Solutions, LLC

Filing address: Brookfield, WIworksites: GA, NJ, NE, CA, TX (5 of 32 states)

  1. Change-of-employer denials
    0.4%
    USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined · n = 552 decided
  2. Median filed wage
    $136,136
    DOL LCA · FY2025 · n = 417 certified
  3. Green-card (PERM) filings
    427
    DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
  4. Layoff notices (WARN)
    No CA records
    State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24
    Worksites in GA, NJ, NE, TX, FL and 26 other states — not covered.

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

0.4%
n = 552petitions decided · FY2021–FY2025 combined

You are changing employers. That is the share of petitions like yours that Fiserv Solutions, LLC had denied over the 5 fiscal years FY2021–FY2025 taken together — not in any single year. 552 change-of-employer petitions were decided across those years; 2 were denied. The year-by-year split is in the second table below. USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

FY2025 alone: 0 denials in 82 decisions.

The table below splits petitions by filing type, over FY2021–FY2025 combined. The types do not face the same odds — find the row that matches your own situation.

All figures in this table are FY2021–FY2025 combined totals.
Filing typeApprovedDeniednDenied share
Change of employerYou move from another company to this one55025520.4%
New employmentFirst-time H-1B — subject to the annual lottery18531881.6%
ContinuationExtending an H-1B you already hold here19321951.0%
AmendedA change at the same employer62386311.3%
Change with same employerNew role, same employer43154361.1%
New concurrentA second, simultaneous H-1B1011 decision

Where fewer than 20 petitions were decided we print the count instead of a percentage. A percentage drawn from a handful of cases reads like a probability, and it is not one. How the sample thresholds are set.

Year by year, change-of-employer petitions only. The headline above combines the FY2021–FY2025 rows of this table (marked in window); the other years are shown because the denial climate in earlier years was not the same one.

Change of employer, by fiscal year.
Fiscal yearApprovedDeniednDenied shareWindow
FY2026 (through Q3)450450%
FY2025820820%in window
FY202413701370.0%in window
FY2023941951%in window
FY202210911100.9%in window
FY202112801280.0%in window
FY2020290290%
FY20191711818 decisions
FY2018242268%
FY20176066 decisions
FY2016000
FY2015000
FY20147077 decisions
FY20134044 decisions
FY20123033 decisions
FY20112022 decisions
FY20101011 decision
FY20092022 decisions

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Headline window FY2021–FY2025 combined · Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.
Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

Why 5 years combined, and why these 5?

A single year of one employer's petitions is often a handful of cases, and a percentage drawn from a handful reads like a probability. Combining fiscal years raises the count — but only if the years belong to the same period. Across all employers in our data, the share of change-of-employer petitions denied ran at 9.54% in FY2018, 9.42% in FY2019 and 4.99% in FY2020, and has stayed between 1.28% and 1.99% in every one of the 5 years from FY2021 through FY2025. Averaging the earlier years together with FY2025 would not produce a steadier estimate; it would produce a number that describes no period at all. So the window stops where the earlier adjudication climate begins, and every figure drawn from it is labelled with the years it covers.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
$136,136
n = 417certified filings

FY2025 median, from 417 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2025

Fiscal yearFiled wageFilings (n)CertifiedWithdrawnDenied
FY2026 (through Q3)$130,562 · median of 30330330390
FY2025$136,136 · median of 41741741701
FY2024$128,250 · median of 48248248221
FY2023$124,264 · median of 28828828830
FY2022$116,400 · median of 56256256212
FY2021$107,037 · median of 39339339330

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

What this company pays by job title

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Job titleFiled wageWage sample (n)
Software Engineer
across 3 seniority levels: $125,972 – $145,725
By seniority (7)

Senior: $145,725 · median of 114
(unstated): $125,972 · median of 26
Staff: $145,725 · median of 18
Level 2: 4 filings — too few for a median
Level 3: 4 filings — too few for a median
Level 4: 4 filings — too few for a median
Principal: 3 filings — too few for a median

$134,493
median of 173
173
Qa Engineer
across 2 seniority levels: $96,398 – $108,482
By seniority (3)

(unstated): $96,398 · median of 30
Senior: $108,482 · median of 20
Staff: 2 filings — too few for a median

$97,594
median of 52
52
Devops Engineer
across 2 seniority levels: $108,212 – $132,860
By seniority (2)

Senior: $108,212 · median of 12
(unstated): $132,860 · median of 10

$130,426
median of 22
22
Product Manager
By seniority (3)

Senior: $148,933 · median of 13
Level 2: 2 filings — too few for a median
Principal: $116,979 · 1 filing

$141,867
median of 16
16
Business Analyst
By seniority (2)

Senior: $112,036 · median of 13
(unstated): 2 filings — too few for a median

$112,036
median of 15
15
Data Scientist
By seniority (3)

(unstated): 9 filings — too few for a median
Senior: 3 filings — too few for a median
Level 4: $105,643 · 1 filing

$138,590
median of 13
13
Site Reliability Engineer
By seniority (3)

Senior: 6 filings — too few for a median
(unstated): 3 filings — too few for a median
Staff: $185,000 · 1 filing

$138,226
median of 10
10
Data Engineer
By seniority (3)

Senior: 5 filings — too few for a median
(unstated): 2 filings — too few for a median
Lead: $142,002 · 1 filing


8 filings — too few for a median
8
Architect
By seniority (4)

(unstated): 4 filings — too few for a median
Lead: $101,296 · 1 filing
Principal: $138,445 · 1 filing
Senior: $124,779 · 1 filing


7 filings — too few for a median
7
Cloud Engineer
By seniority (1)

Senior: 7 filings — too few for a median


7 filings — too few for a median
7

Showing the 10 largest of 16 job titles this employer filed for. This list is truncated, not complete.

Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Wages are medians of certified filings; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Basis certified filings with a stated wage; medians, not averages

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+2%
n = 2,445certified filings

Filed wages sit 2% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filedFilings (n)Filed wagePrevailing wageDifference
Level I33$70,000 · median of 33$69,909 · median of 33+0.1%
Level II76$101,358 · median of 76$101,296 · median of 76+0.1%
Level III885$107,557 · median of 885$105,040 · median of 885+2.4%
Level IV953$128,378 · median of 953$124,779 · median of 953+2.9%
Not stated on the filing498$139,685 · median of 498$139,543 · median of 498+0.1%

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Yes — PERM filings on record

427 permanent labor certification applications were decided across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 65 of them in FY2026 (through Q3).

Fiscal yearCertifiedCertified-expiredDeniedWithdrawnTotal
FY2026 (through Q3)6220165
FY202523570181
FY202442481394
FY202347400390
FY202244171365
FY20212740132

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices
No California WARN notices on record for this employer (2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24). That part is a real zero, not missing data. But this employer also has worksites in GA, NJ, NE, TX, FL, and we have not loaded those states — layoffs there would not show up here.

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This page combines 6 filing names

how we grouped them

One company files under many spellings and many legal entities. We combine them so the numbers above cover the whole company rather than one spelling of it — and we list what we combined, so you can check the grouping instead of taking our word for it.

Show the filing names behind this page
Name as filedFEIN (last 4)Filings
Fiserv Solutions, LLC36952,430
FISERV SOLUTIONS, LLC33
FIserv Solutions, LLC2
Fiserv Solutions LLC2

Showing the 4 most common of 6 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else Fiserv Solutions, LLC appears on this site

by filing volume

Places. It is among the top filers in Alpharetta, GA, Berkeley Heights, NJ, Omaha, NE, Frisco, TX, Coral Springs, FL, Marietta, GA, Hunt Valley, MD and Hagerstown, MD. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in WI with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

American Family Mutual Insurance, S.I. (9) · Ashley Distribution Services Ltd. (9) · Ashley HomeStores, LTD (9) · Beloit College (9) · Bright Dental Madison, LLC (9) · Columbia St. Mary's Hospital Milwaukee, Inc. (9) · Digital Transformation Services LLC. (9) · Familia Dental Janesville LLC (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in WI are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.