The Sponsor File

Humana Inc.

Filing address: Louisville, KYworksites: KY, TX, CA, MA, NC (5 of 39 states)

  1. Change-of-employer denials
    0.5%
    USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined · n = 404 decided
  2. Median filed wage
    $130,645
    DOL LCA · FY2025 · n = 276 certified
  3. Green-card (PERM) filings
    273
    DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
  4. Layoff notices (WARN)
    No CA records
    State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24
    Worksites in KY, TX, MA, NC, IL and 33 other states — not covered.

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

0.5%
n = 404petitions decided · FY2021–FY2025 combined

You are changing employers. That is the share of petitions like yours that Humana Inc. had denied over the 5 fiscal years FY2021–FY2025 taken together — not in any single year. 404 change-of-employer petitions were decided across those years; 2 were denied. The year-by-year split is in the second table below. USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

FY2025 alone: 0 denials in 41 decisions.

The table below splits petitions by filing type, over FY2021–FY2025 combined. The types do not face the same odds — find the row that matches your own situation.

All figures in this table are FY2021–FY2025 combined totals.
Filing typeApprovedDeniednDenied share
Change of employerYou move from another company to this one40224040.5%
New employmentFirst-time H-1B — subject to the annual lottery911921%
ContinuationExtending an H-1B you already hold here40744111.0%
AmendedA change at the same employer13001300.0%
Change with same employerNew role, same employer400400%
New concurrentA second, simultaneous H-1B1011 decision

Where fewer than 20 petitions were decided we print the count instead of a percentage. A percentage drawn from a handful of cases reads like a probability, and it is not one. How the sample thresholds are set.

Year by year, change-of-employer petitions only. The headline above combines the FY2021–FY2025 rows of this table (marked in window); the other years are shown because the denial climate in earlier years was not the same one.

Change of employer, by fiscal year.
Fiscal yearApprovedDeniednDenied shareWindow
FY2026 (through Q3)440440%
FY2025410410%in window
FY2024270270%in window
FY202312211230.8%in window
FY202212111220.8%in window
FY2021910910%in window
FY20201401414 decisions
FY20193144 decisions
FY20181201212 decisions
FY20177077 decisions
FY20161501515 decisions
FY2015270270%
FY2014360360%
FY20137077 decisions
FY2012000
FY20111011 decision
FY2010000
FY20095055 decisions

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Headline window FY2021–FY2025 combined · Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.
Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

Why 5 years combined, and why these 5?

A single year of one employer's petitions is often a handful of cases, and a percentage drawn from a handful reads like a probability. Combining fiscal years raises the count — but only if the years belong to the same period. Across all employers in our data, the share of change-of-employer petitions denied ran at 9.54% in FY2018, 9.42% in FY2019 and 4.99% in FY2020, and has stayed between 1.28% and 1.99% in every one of the 5 years from FY2021 through FY2025. Averaging the earlier years together with FY2025 would not produce a steadier estimate; it would produce a number that describes no period at all. So the window stops where the earlier adjudication climate begins, and every figure drawn from it is labelled with the years it covers.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
$130,645
n = 276certified filings

FY2025 median, from 276 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2025

Fiscal yearFiled wageFilings (n)CertifiedWithdrawnDenied
FY2026 (through Q3)$136,500 · median of 26026026111
FY2025$130,645 · median of 27627627840
FY2024$131,061 · median of 24524524511
FY2023$134,992 · median of 28228228222
FY2022$128,407 · median of 27427427400
FY2021$119,025 · median of 20920920930

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

What this company pays by job title

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Job titleFiled wageWage sample (n)
Software Engineer
across 3 seniority levels: $105,250 – $150,000
By seniority (4)

Senior: $125,291 · median of 267
Lead: $150,000 · median of 38
Level 2: $105,250 · median of 32
Level 1: 8 filings — too few for a median

$125,000
median of 345
345
Architect
across 3 seniority levels: $145,600 – $189,604
By seniority (4)

Lead: $157,560 · median of 77
Senior: $145,600 · median of 57
Principal: $189,604 · median of 12
(unstated): $131,677 · 1 filing

$154,565
median of 147
147
Data Scientist
across 3 seniority levels: $105,000 – $155,000
By seniority (3)

Senior: $134,868 · median of 34
Lead: $155,000 · median of 15
Level 2: $105,000 · median of 12

$134,736
median of 61
61
Data Engineer
By seniority (4)

Senior: $143,000 · median of 30
Level 2: 7 filings — too few for a median
Lead: 3 filings — too few for a median
Principal: 2 filings — too few for a median

$140,054
median of 42
42
Devops Engineer
By seniority (2)

Senior: $125,214 · median of 11
Lead: 3 filings — too few for a median

$130,402
median of 14
14
Product Manager
By seniority (3)

Senior: 6 filings — too few for a median
Lead: 3 filings — too few for a median
Principal: 2 filings — too few for a median

$151,950
median of 11
11
Qa Engineer
By seniority (2)

Senior: 6 filings — too few for a median
Level 2: 5 filings — too few for a median

$91,270
median of 11
11
Consultant
By seniority (1)

(unstated): 5 filings — too few for a median


5 filings — too few for a median
5
Network Engineer
By seniority (1)

Senior: 4 filings — too few for a median


4 filings — too few for a median
4
Physician
By seniority (1)

(unstated): 4 filings — too few for a median


4 filings — too few for a median
4

Showing the 10 largest of 14 job titles this employer filed for. This list is truncated, not complete.

Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Wages are medians of certified filings; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Basis certified filings with a stated wage; medians, not averages

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+20.4%
n = 1,546certified filings

Filed wages sit 20.4% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filedFilings (n)Filed wagePrevailing wageDifference
Level I62$92,250 · median of 62$74,911 · median of 62+23.1%
Level II282$111,744 · median of 282$84,708 · median of 282+31.9%
Level III84$127,750 · median of 84$105,643 · median of 84+20.9%
Level IV879$140,000 · median of 879$114,712 · median of 879+22%
Marked not applicable1$225,000 · 1 filing$208,000 · 1 filing
Not stated on the filing238$123,709 · median of 238$118,658 · median of 238+4.3%

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Yes — PERM filings on record

273 permanent labor certification applications were decided across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 83 of them in FY2026 (through Q3).

Fiscal yearCertifiedCertified-expiredDeniedWithdrawnTotal
FY2026 (through Q3)7640383
FY202519610484
FY20247230131
FY20232861035
FY202213182033
FY202133017

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices
No California WARN notices on record for this employer (2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24). That part is a real zero, not missing data. But this employer also has worksites in KY, TX, MA, NC, IL, and we have not loaded those states — layoffs there would not show up here.

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This page combines 14 filing names

how we grouped them

One company files under many spellings and many legal entities. We combine them so the numbers above cover the whole company rather than one spelling of it — and we list what we combined, so you can check the grouping instead of taking our word for it.

Show the filing names behind this page
Name as filedFEIN (last 4)Filings
Humana Inc.75381,406
Humana, Inc.753887
Humana Inc753863
Humana, Inc75386
Humana Inc:1
Humana. Inc.1

Showing the 6 most common of 14 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else Humana Inc. appears on this site

by filing volume

Roles. Humana Inc. is among the top filers for Architect. Those pages show the median filed wage for the role across all employers.

Places. It is among the top filers in Louisville, KY, Campbell, CA, Green Bay, WI, Celina, TX, De Pere, WI, Wesley Chapel, FL, Monroe Township, NJ and Woodstock, GA. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in KY with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

Constellium Bowling Green LLC (9) · HTTP Holdings, LLC (9) · Lindsey Wilson College (9) · Reliant Consulting Services LLC (9) · Access PT, OT, New York, PLLC (8) · American Board of Family Medicine, Inc. (8) · Eurofins Genomics, LLC (8) · Frost Brown Todd LLP (8)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in KY are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.