Kyyba, Inc.

Filing address: Farmington Hills, MIworksites: MI, IL, TX, SC, MA (5 of 24 states)

Change-of-employer denials
2%
USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined · n = 81 decided
Median filed wage
$110,864
DOL LCA · FY2025 · n = 32 certified
Green-card (PERM) filings
100
DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Layoff notices (WARN)
No CA records
State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24
Worksites in MI, IL, TX, SC, MA and 18 other states — not covered.

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

n = 81petitions decided · FY2021–FY2025 combined

You are changing employers. That is the share of petitions like yours that Kyyba, Inc. had denied over the 5 fiscal years FY2021–FY2025 taken together — not in any single year. 81 change-of-employer petitions were decided across those years; 2 were denied. The year-by-year split is in the second table below. USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

The table below splits petitions by filing type, over FY2021–FY2025 combined. The types do not face the same odds — find the row that matches your own situation.

All figures in this table are FY2021–FY2025 combined totals.
Filing type	Approved	Denied	n	Denied share
Change of employerYou move from another company to this one	79	2	81	2%
New employmentFirst-time H-1B — subject to the annual lottery	75	1	76	1%
ContinuationExtending an H-1B you already hold here	47	0	47	0%
AmendedA change at the same employer	40	0	40	0%
Change with same employerNew role, same employer	27	0	27	0%
New concurrentA second, simultaneous H-1B	0	0	0	—

Where fewer than 20 petitions were decided we print the count instead of a percentage. A percentage drawn from a handful of cases reads like a probability, and it is not one. How the sample thresholds are set.

Year by year, change-of-employer petitions only. The headline above combines the FY2021–FY2025 rows of this table (marked in window); the other years are shown because the denial climate in earlier years was not the same one.

Change of employer, by fiscal year.
Fiscal year	Approved	Denied	n	Denied share	Window
FY2026 (through Q3)	8	1	9	9 decisions	—
FY2025	9	1	10	10 decisions	in window
FY2024	11	0	11	11 decisions	in window
FY2023	21	1	22	5%	in window
FY2022	15	0	15	15 decisions	in window
FY2021	23	0	23	0%	in window
FY2020	16	1	17	17 decisions	—
FY2019	16	2	18	18 decisions	—
FY2018	14	3	17	17 decisions	—
FY2017	17	3	20	15%	—
FY2016	21	0	21	0%	—
FY2015	9	0	9	9 decisions	—
FY2014	12	2	14	14 decisions	—
FY2013	12	2	14	14 decisions	—
FY2012	7	0	7	7 decisions	—
FY2011	9	0	9	9 decisions	—
FY2010	4	0	4	4 decisions	—

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Headline window FY2021–FY2025 combined · Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.

Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

Why 5 years combined, and why these 5?

A single year of one employer's petitions is often a handful of cases, and a percentage drawn from a handful reads like a probability. Combining fiscal years raises the count — but only if the years belong to the same period. Across all employers in our data, the share of change-of-employer petitions denied ran at 9.54% in FY2018, 9.42% in FY2019 and 4.99% in FY2020, and has stayed between 1.28% and 1.99% in every one of the 5 years from FY2021 through FY2025. Averaging the earlier years together with FY2025 would not produce a steadier estimate; it would produce a number that describes no period at all. So the window stops where the earlier adjudication climate begins, and every figure drawn from it is labelled with the years it covers.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

$110,864

n = 32certified filings

FY2025 median, from 32 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2025

Fiscal year	Filed wage	Filings (n)	Certified	Withdrawn
FY2026 (through Q3)	$112,320 · median of 55	55	55	31
FY2025	$110,864 · median of 32	32	32	23
FY2024	$113,360 · median of 49	49	49	42
FY2023	$96,096 · median of 45	45	45	47
FY2022	$95,680 · median of 60	60	60	71
FY2021	$94,744 · median of 78	78	78	40

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

What this company pays by job title

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Only one of this employer’s 12 job titles has enough filings for a median — 10 certified filings is the threshold. The largest of the rest are listed below with their filing counts.

Job title	Filed wage	Wage sample (n)
Software Engineer By seniority (3) (unstated): $135,200 · median of 12 Senior: 5 filings — too few for a median Level 2: 4 filings — too few for a median	$135,200 median of 21	21
Data Scientist By seniority (3) (unstated): 3 filings — too few for a median Level 1: 2 filings — too few for a median Level 2: 2 filings — too few for a median	7 filings — too few for a median	7
Industrial Engineer By seniority (1) (unstated): 7 filings — too few for a median	7 filings — too few for a median	7
Qa Engineer By seniority (3) (unstated): 3 filings — too few for a median Level 2: $75,150 · 1 filing Senior: $92,706 · 1 filing	5 filings — too few for a median	5
Business Analyst By seniority (1) (unstated): 3 filings — too few for a median	3 filings — too few for a median	3
Architect By seniority (1) (unstated): 2 filings — too few for a median	2 filings — too few for a median	2
Devops Engineer By seniority (1) (unstated): 2 filings — too few for a median	2 filings — too few for a median	2
Electrical Engineer By seniority (1) (unstated): 2 filings — too few for a median	2 filings — too few for a median	2
Accountant By seniority (1) Senior: $85,000 · 1 filing	$85,000 1 filing	1
Data Analyst By seniority (1) (unstated): $108,160 · 1 filing	$108,160 1 filing	1

Showing the 10 largest of 12 job titles this employer filed for. This list is truncated, not complete.

Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Wages are medians of certified filings; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Basis certified filings with a stated wage; medians, not averages

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+16.7%

n = 319certified filings

Filed wages sit 16.7% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filed	Filings (n)	Filed wage	Prevailing wage	Difference
Level I	56	$75,379 · median of 56	$68,484 · median of 56	+10.1%
Level II	145	$96,637 · median of 145	$84,302 · median of 145	+14.6%
Level III	74	$121,160 · median of 74	$99,288 · median of 74	+22%
Level IV	44	$132,340 · median of 44	$111,093 · median of 44	+19.1%

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Yes — PERM filings on record

100 permanent labor certification applications were decided across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 10 of them in FY2026 (through Q3).

Fiscal year	Certified	Certified-expired	Withdrawn	Total
FY2026 (through Q3)	10	0	0	10
FY2025	9	8	3	20
FY2024	0	11	5	16
FY2023	7	6	6	19
FY2022	6	0	1	7
FY2021	18	7	3	28

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices

No California WARN notices on record for this employer (2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24). That part is a real zero, not missing data. But this employer also has worksites in MI, IL, TX, SC, MA, and we have not loaded those states — layoffs there would not show up here.

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This page combines 3 filing names

how we grouped them

One company files under many spellings and many legal entities. We combine them so the numbers above cover the whole company rather than one spelling of it — and we list what we combined, so you can check the grouping instead of taking our word for it.

Show the filing names behind this page

Name as filed	FEIN (last 4)	Filings
Kyyba, Inc.	6497	571
Kyyba Inc	—	2

Showing the 2 most common of 3 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else Kyyba, Inc. appears on this site

by filing volume

Places. It is among the top filers in Auburn Hills, MI, Warren, MI, Chelsea, MI, North Chicago, IL, Saline, MI, Georgetown, KY, Moline, IL and Waterloo, IA. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in MI with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

Air International US Inc (9) · Aisin World Corporation of America (9) · ARaymond North America LLC (9) · Aretek Solutions, Inc. (9) · AUMOVIO Autonomous Mobility US, LLC f/k/a Continental Autonomous Mobility US, LLC (9) · Avancez, LLC (9) · Bethany Christian Services (9) · BOS Automotive Products, Inc (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in MI are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.