The Sponsor File

LNW Gaming Inc., f/k/a SG Gaming Inc.

Filing address: Las Vegas, NVworksites: NV, GA, NJ, CA

  1. Change-of-employer denials
    not covered
    USCIS · FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3)
    No USCIS petition records under this name.
  2. Median filed wage
    $114,000
    DOL LCA · FY2023 · n = 12 certified
  3. Green-card (PERM) filings
    6
    DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
  4. Layoff notices (WARN)
    No CA records
    State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24
    Worksites in NV, GA, NJ — not covered.

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

No USCIS petition records are on file for this employer.Our USCIS coverage is FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3). Employers appear here only once USCIS has decided at least one H-1B petition filed under this name.

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.
Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
$114,000
n = 12certified filings

FY2023 median, from 12 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2023

Fiscal yearFiled wageFilings (n)CertifiedWithdrawnDenied
FY20246 filings — too few for a median6630
FY2023$114,000 · median of 12121200

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

Pay for this company’s largest job title

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Job titleFiled wageWage sample (n)
Software Engineer
By seniority (1)

Senior: 3 filings — too few for a median


3 filings — too few for a median
3

Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Wages are medians of certified filings; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Basis certified filings with a stated wage; medians, not averages

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+7.6%
n = 18certified filings

Filed wages sit 7.6% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filedFilings (n)Filed wagePrevailing wageDifference
Level II88 filings — too few for a median8 filings — too few for a median
Level III66 filings — too few for a median6 filings — too few for a median
Level IV44 filings — too few for a median4 filings — too few for a median

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Yes — PERM filings on record

6 permanent labor certification applications were decided across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 6 of them in FY2025.

Fiscal yearCertifiedCertified-expiredDeniedWithdrawnTotal
FY202515006

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices
No California WARN notices on record for this employer (2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24). That part is a real zero, not missing data. But this employer also has worksites in NV, GA, NJ, and we have not loaded those states — layoffs there would not show up here.

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This page combines 12 filing names

how we grouped them

One company files under many spellings and many legal entities. We combine them so the numbers above cover the whole company rather than one spelling of it — and we list what we combined, so you can check the grouping instead of taking our word for it.

Show the filing names behind this page
Name as filedFEIN (last 4)Filings
LNW Gaming Inc., f/k/a SG Gaming Inc.60649
LNW Gaming, Inc. f/k/a SG Gaming Inc.60645
LNW Gaming, Inc., f/k/a SG Gaming Inc.60643
LNW Gaming Inc. , f/k/a SG Gaming, Inc.60642
LNW Gaming, Inc. f/k/a SG gaming Inc.1
LNW Gaming, Inc., f/k/a/ SG Gaming, Inc.60641

Showing the 6 most common of 12 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else LNW Gaming Inc., f/k/a SG Gaming Inc. appears on this site

by filing volume

Places. It is among the top filers in Egg Harbor Township, NJ. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in NV with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

1047 Games, Inc. (9) · C.A. Group, Inc. (9) · Eid Nevada Critical Care, PLLC (9) · Hamilton Company (9) · M5B LLC (9) · OPTX Solutions, LLC (9) · Rimini Street, Inc. (9) · Roseman University of Health Sciences (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in NV are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.