The Sponsor File

LTIMindtree

Filing address: Edison, NJworksites: TX, WA, NJ, FL, CT (5 of 43 states)

  1. Change-of-employer denials
    0.79%
    USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined · n = 1,780 decided
  2. Median filed wage
    $105,997
    DOL LCA · FY2025 · n = 2,644 certified
  3. Green-card (PERM) filings
    1,151
    DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
  4. Layoff notices (WARN)
    No CA records
    State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24
    Worksites in TX, WA, NJ, FL, CT and 37 other states — not covered.

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

0.79%
n = 1,780petitions decided · FY2021–FY2025 combined

You are changing employers. That is the share of petitions like yours that LTIMindtree had denied over the 5 fiscal years FY2021–FY2025 taken together — not in any single year. 1,780 change-of-employer petitions were decided across those years; 14 were denied. The year-by-year split is in the second table below. USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

FY2025 alone: 2.5%. FY2021–FY2025 combined: 0.79%.

The table below splits petitions by filing type, over FY2021–FY2025 combined. The types do not face the same odds — find the row that matches your own situation.

All figures in this table are FY2021–FY2025 combined totals.
Filing typeApprovedDeniednDenied share
Change of employerYou move from another company to this one1,766141,7800.79%
New employmentFirst-time H-1B — subject to the annual lottery3,091643,1552.03%
ContinuationExtending an H-1B you already hold here50595141.8%
AmendedA change at the same employer5,227345,2610.65%
Change with same employerNew role, same employer25472612.7%
New concurrentA second, simultaneous H-1B000

Where fewer than 20 petitions were decided we print the count instead of a percentage. A percentage drawn from a handful of cases reads like a probability, and it is not one. How the sample thresholds are set.

Year by year, change-of-employer petitions only. The headline above combines the FY2021–FY2025 rows of this table (marked in window); the other years are shown because the denial climate in earlier years was not the same one.

Change of employer, by fiscal year.
Fiscal yearApprovedDeniednDenied shareWindow
FY2026 (through Q3)20402040.0%
FY202531483222.5%in window
FY202431923210.6%in window
FY202337523770.5%in window
FY202249414950.2%in window
FY202126412650.4%in window
FY202024522470.8%
FY2019494365306.8%
FY20184386750513.3%
FY201721352182.3%
FY201625782653.0%
FY201522332261.3%
FY201417941832.2%
FY2013740740%
FY2012491502%
FY2011841851%
FY2010554597%
FY2009343378%

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Headline window FY2021–FY2025 combined · Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.
Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

Why 5 years combined, and why these 5?

A single year of one employer's petitions is often a handful of cases, and a percentage drawn from a handful reads like a probability. Combining fiscal years raises the count — but only if the years belong to the same period. Across all employers in our data, the share of change-of-employer petitions denied ran at 9.54% in FY2018, 9.42% in FY2019 and 4.99% in FY2020, and has stayed between 1.28% and 1.99% in every one of the 5 years from FY2021 through FY2025. Averaging the earlier years together with FY2025 would not produce a steadier estimate; it would produce a number that describes no period at all. So the window stops where the earlier adjudication climate begins, and every figure drawn from it is labelled with the years it covers.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
$105,997
n = 2,644certified filings

FY2025 median, from 2,644 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2025

Fiscal yearFiled wageFilings (n)CertifiedWithdrawnDenied
FY2026 (through Q3)$100,942 · median of 1,1161,1161,117240
FY2025$105,997 · median of 2,6442,6442,645170
FY2024$103,210 · median of 2,8332,8332,836265
FY2023$99,008 · median of 2,5102,5102,513820
FY2022$92,932 · median of 2,9762,9762,976770
FY2021$90,627 · median of 2,6422,6422,643800

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+12.1%
n = 14,721certified filings

Filed wages sit 12.1% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filedFilings (n)Filed wagePrevailing wageDifference
Level I326$65,406 · median of 326$58,261 · median of 326+12.3%
Level II13,160$96,928 · median of 13,160$86,653 · median of 13,160+11.9%
Level III1,185$113,797 · median of 1,185$99,549 · median of 1,185+14.3%
Level IV35$165,600 · median of 35$139,797 · median of 35+18.5%
Not stated on the filing15$92,288 · median of 15$92,288 · median of 15+0%

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Yes — PERM filings on record

1,151 permanent labor certification applications were decided across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 200 of them in FY2026 (through Q3).

Fiscal yearCertifiedCertified-expiredDeniedWithdrawnTotal
FY2026 (through Q3)1682507200
FY202512759020206
FY20241607908247
FY2023527407133
FY2022288000108
FY20211609601257

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices
No California WARN notices on record for this employer (2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24). That part is a real zero, not missing data. But this employer also has worksites in TX, WA, NJ, FL, CT, and we have not loaded those states — layoffs there would not show up here.

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This page combines 32 filing names

how we grouped them

One company files under many spellings and many legal entities. We combine them so the numbers above cover the whole company rather than one spelling of it — and we list what we combined, so you can check the grouping instead of taking our word for it.

Show the filing names behind this page
Name as filedFEIN (last 4)Filings
LTIMindtree Limited43034,533
Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited43032,826
LTIMINDTREE LIMITED43032,560
MINDTREE LIMITED1,833
LTIMINDTREE Limited43031,767
Mindtree Limited830
LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED602
LTIMINDTREE LTD89
Larsen & Toubro InfoTech Limited1

Showing the 9 most common of 32 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else LTIMindtree appears on this site

by filing volume

Roles. LTIMindtree is among the top filers for Architect and Project Manager. Those pages show the median filed wage for the role across all employers.

Places. It is among the top filers in Irving, TX, Houston, TX, Hartford, CT, Tampa, FL, Redmond, WA, Cincinnati, OH, Bellevue, WA and Jersey City, NJ. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in NJ with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

A&J Consulting Engineering Services, P.C. (9) · Access Bio, Inc. (9) · Accu Reference Medical Laboratory LLC (9) · ADP Tax Services, Inc. (9) · AdvaGen Pharma, Ltd. (9) · Advanced Infrastructure Design, INC (9) · Aeis LLC (9) · Apprentice FS, Inc. (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in NJ are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.