The Sponsor File

Microsoft Corporation

Filing address: Redmond, WAworksites: WA, CA, TX, GA, NC (5 of 49 states)

  1. Change-of-employer denials
    0.53%
    USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined · n = 6,078 decided
  2. Median filed wage
    $170,766
    DOL LCA · FY2025 · n = 9,215 filings with a wage
  3. Historical PERM records
    16,796
    DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
  4. WARN source records
    19 source records
    State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24

Historical filed wages are not verified amounts paid to workers. USCIS decisions do not estimate an individual petition’s outcome. Current sponsorship for a particular role is not verified here. One LCA is not one job.

Filing names grouped on this page may differ across sources. The record does not establish which legal entity would employ or petition for you.

Historical USCIS decisions by petition type

USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

0.53%
n = 6,078petitions decided · FY2021–FY2025 combined

For change-of-employer petitions matched to this page, 32 were denied out of 6,078 decisions in FY2021–FY2025 combined. These historical decisions do not estimate the outcome of an individual petition. The year-by-year split is in the second table below. USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

FY2025 alone: 0.3%. FY2021–FY2025 combined: 0.53%.

The table below splits petitions by filing type, over FY2021–FY2025 combined. Application categories describe the petitions in the source data; they do not determine which category or outcome applies to an individual.

All figures in this table are FY2021–FY2025 combined totals.
Filing typeApprovedDeniednDenied share
Change of employerPetitions classified as a change of employer6,046326,0780.53%
New employmentPetitions classified as new employment5,930325,9620.54%
ContinuationPetitions classified as continuation of employment5,455985,5531.76%
AmendedA change at the same employer2,380262,4061.08%
Change with same employerNew role, same employer9,6171589,7751.62%
New concurrentA second, simultaneous H-1B2022 decisions

Where fewer than 20 petitions were decided we print the count instead of a percentage. A percentage drawn from a handful of cases reads like a probability, and it is not one. How the sample thresholds are set.

Year by year, change-of-employer petitions only. The headline above combines the FY2021–FY2025 rows of this table (marked in window); the other years are shown because the denial climate in earlier years was not the same one.

Change of employer, by fiscal year.
Fiscal yearApprovedDeniednDenied shareWindow
FY2026 (through Q3)1,16611,1670.09%—
FY202568126830.3%in window
FY202471637190.4%in window
FY2023445104552.2%in window
FY20222,529122,5410.47%in window
FY20211,67551,6800.30%in window
FY20201,621161,6370.98%—
FY20191,109251,1342.20%—
FY20181,193121,2051.00%—
FY201776317640.1%—
FY201674137440.4%—
FY201527732801.1%—
FY201442734300.7%—
FY201349044940.8%—
FY201243704370.0%—
FY201133723390.6%—
FY201027812790.4%—
FY200918721891.1%—

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method · Combined decision window FY2021–FY2025 combined

USCIS petition decisions are separate from DOL LCA and PERM statuses. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.
Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

The source reports separate application categories. We keep them separate and use change-of-employer decisions for the headline, rather than blend different categories. These historical categories do not determine the process or outcome for a current role.

Why 5 years combined, and why these 5?

A single year of one employer's petitions is often a handful of cases, and a percentage drawn from a handful reads like a probability. Combining fiscal years raises the count — but only if the years belong to the same period. Across all employers in our data, the share of change-of-employer petitions denied ran at 9.54% in FY2018, 9.42% in FY2019 and 4.99% in FY2020, and has stayed between 1.28% and 1.99% in every one of the 5 years from FY2021 through FY2025. Averaging the earlier years together with FY2025 would not produce a steadier estimate; it would produce a number that describes no period at all. So the window stops where the earlier adjudication climate begins, and every figure drawn from it is labelled with the years it covers.

Historical filed wages for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
$170,766
n = 9,215filings with a wage

FY2025 median, from 9,215 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2025

Fiscal yearFiled wageWage sample (n)CertifiedWithdrawnDenied
FY2026 (through Q3)$177,000 · median of 5,1585,1585,15900
FY2025$170,766 · median of 9,2159,2159,215861
FY2024$162,100 · median of 9,4919,4919,49101
FY2023$163,200 · median of 7,8197,8197,81900
FY2022$150,000 · median of 11,54611,54611,54700
FY2021$143,100 · median of 7,3297,3297,32900

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method · Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

Filed wages exclude bonuses and equity and do not confirm actual pay. DOL LCA Denied counts are not USCIS petition decisions.

What an LCA wage and status describe

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

Filed wages by job title

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Job titleFiled wageWage sample (n)
Software Engineer
across 4 seniority levels: $159,700 – $215,000
By seniority (5)

(unstated): $159,700 · median of 30,123
Senior: $171,000 · median of 661
Lead: $190,469 · median of 189
Principal: $215,000 · median of 97
Staff: $216,200 · 1 filing

$160,000
median of 31,071
31,071
Product Manager
across 3 seniority levels: $173,401 – $216,385
By seniority (3)

(unstated): $173,401 · median of 2,023
Senior: $180,500 · median of 43
Principal: $216,385 · median of 12

$173,707
median of 2,078
2,078
Program Manager
across 3 seniority levels: $137,000 – $198,047
By seniority (3)

(unstated): $137,000 · median of 705
Senior: $168,102 · median of 609
Principal: $198,047 · median of 128

$155,000
median of 1,442
1,442
Data Scientist
across 2 seniority levels: $163,322 – $172,000
By seniority (3)

(unstated): $163,322 · median of 863
Senior: $172,000 · median of 22
Staff: $236,797 · 1 filing

$163,881
median of 886
886
Hardware Engineer
By seniority (2)

(unstated): $160,900 · median of 232
Senior: 7 filings — too few for a median

$160,900
median of 239
239
Data Engineer
By seniority (2)

(unstated): $161,000 · median of 149
Senior: 5 filings — too few for a median

$161,050
median of 154
154
Site Reliability Engineer
By seniority (2)

(unstated): $157,674 · median of 137
Senior: $190,000 · 1 filing

$157,674
median of 138
138
Electrical Engineer
By seniority (2)

(unstated): $149,831 · median of 103
Senior: 3 filings — too few for a median

$149,833
median of 106
106
Mechanical Engineer
By seniority (2)

(unstated): $143,490 · median of 50
Senior: $142,870 · 1 filing

$143,490
median of 51
51
Architect
By seniority (2)

(unstated): $153,665 · median of 26
Senior: $142,500 · 1 filing

$153,275
median of 27
27

Showing the 10 largest of 20 job titles this employer filed for. This list is truncated, not complete.

Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Reported wages are from LCA filings, not verified amounts paid to workers. Each value is labeled as a single filing, a median with its sample size, or a withheld small sample; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method · Basis certified filings with a stated wage; single-file values or medians above the sample threshold; not averages

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how its filed wage compares with that reference. These are historical filings, not verified offers.

+24.6%
n = 50,558certified filings

Filed wages sit 24.6% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filedFilings (n)Filed wagePrevailing wageDifference
Level I5,272$122,940 · median of 5,272$92,102 · median of 5,272+33.5%
Level II21,296$147,237 · median of 21,296$119,350 · median of 21,296+23.4%
Level III17,984$176,837 · median of 17,984$140,920 · median of 17,984+25.5%
Level IV4,870$210,864 · median of 4,870$168,709 · median of 4,870+25%
Not stated on the filing1,136$179,550 · median of 1,136$171,315 · median of 1,136+4.8%

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method · Basis certified filings only; single-file values or medians above the sample threshold; not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Historical PERM labor-certification records

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

PERM records do not establish current employer policy or an individual’s green-card outcome. Certified-expired is kept separate from Denied.

PERM records on file

16,796 permanent labor certification records are present across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 1,683 of them in FY2026 (through Q3).

Fiscal yearCertifiedCertified-expiredDeniedWithdrawnTotal
FY2026 (through Q3)1,504964791,683
FY20252,39053692233,158
FY20243771,357332682,035
FY20231,0891,30791442,549
FY20227461,81791062,678
FY20213,0891,43591604,693

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method

How PERM statuses differ from green-card outcomes

Certified-expired is a status recorded in the PERM source files. We show it separately from certified, denied and withdrawn. These aggregate records do not establish whether a later immigration filing was made, why a record has this status, or whether an individual received a green card.

Matched WARN source records

State WARN notices

Each row is a source record at its filed location. Multiple locations and repeated or amended records are retained; these rows are not a count of independent layoff events or unique people. Entity matching may be incomplete.

Notice dateEffectiveFiled asLocation as filedTypeEmployees
2023-07-102023-09-08Microsoft1045 La Avenida Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent40
2023-06-052023-08-04Microsoft1045 La Avenida Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent2
2023-03-272023-05-26Microsoft1045 La Avenida Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent19
2023-03-272023-05-26Microsoft2820 Northwestern Parkway Santa Clara CA 95051 · CALayoff Permanent1
2023-03-272023-05-26Microsoft11 Great Oaks Blvd San Jose CA 95138 · CALayoff Permanent1
2023-03-062023-05-05Microsoft1045 La Avenida Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent54
2023-03-062023-05-05Microsoft1288 Pear Ave Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent1
2023-03-062023-05-05Microsoft11 Great Oaks Blvd San Jose CA 95138 · CALayoff Permanent1
2023-02-092023-04-10Microsoft1090 La Avenida Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent2
2023-02-092023-04-10Microsoft1045 La Avenida Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent41
2023-02-092023-04-10Microsoft2820 Northwestern Parkway Santa Clara CA 95051 · CALayoff Permanent1
2023-02-092023-04-10Microsoft1288 Pear Ave Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent9
2023-02-092023-04-10Microsoft2401 Walsh Avenue Santa Clara CA 95051 · CALayoff Permanent1
2023-02-092023-04-10Microsoft770 E. Middlefield Road Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent7
2023-02-092023-04-10Microsoft880 E. Middlefield Road Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent1
2023-01-182023-03-20Microsoft2220 De La Cruz Blvd., Bldg 1 Santa Clara CA 95050 · CALayoff Permanent1
2023-01-182023-03-20Microsoft1090 La Avenida Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent1
2023-01-182023-03-20Microsoft1288 Pear Ave Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent3
2023-01-182023-03-20Microsoft1045 La Avenida Mountain View CA 94043 · CALayoff Permanent41

Source State WARN layoff notices ·Coverage CA · 2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24 ·Loaded 2026-08-28 ·Files and method

Questions to verify with the employer

Microsoft Corporation
https://thesponsorfile.com/employer/microsoft-corporation

These questions are prompted by the historical records and data gaps on this page. They are not conclusions about current policy or advice about an individual case.

  1. Filing identity

    Observed on this page: Microsoft Corporation is the page display name. 2 filing-name variants are grouped here. Page scope: grouped filing names; source matching may differ. No group relationship is recorded here; independence is not verified. The future employing or petitioning legal entity is not verified.

    Ask the employer: Which legal entity would employ me and file any petition for this role? How does it relate to the filing names shown here?

    See records: Filing identity

  2. Pay and work location

    Observed on this page: FY2025: $170,766; n=9,215 filings with a wage; median of 9,215. Certified filings with valid annualized wages. Employer-wide filing samples can differ in role, level and location; this is not a like-for-like offer comparison. Filed wages are not verified pay or total compensation.

    Ask the employer: What base pay, job title, level and work location are specified for this role, and how do they relate to the historical filings shown here?

    See records: Pay and work location

  3. Current petition policy

    Observed on this page: FY2021–FY2025 combined: 6,046 approved / 32 denied matched change-of-employer decisions; n=6,078.

    Ask the employer: Does the employer currently support the petition type required for this role, and who can explain the process and timing? These historical counts do not establish current policy.

    See records: Current petition policy

    • USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub · FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) · Loaded 2026-08-28 — https://www.uscis.gov/tools/reports-and-studies/h-1b-employer-data-hub
  4. Current permanent-residence policy

    Observed on this page: 16,796 matched PERM records across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3). n=16,796 source records across all covered years. This is not a count of green cards issued.

    Ask the employer: What is the employer’s current policy for starting an employment-based permanent-residence process for this role, and which entity would handle it? Historical PERM records do not confirm a commitment for this role.

    See records: Current permanent-residence policy

  5. Current team and worksite changes

    Observed on this page: 19 matched California WARN source records; CA · 2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24. 19 source observations Loaded states: CA. Worksite states not loaded: WA, TX, GA, NC, NY, MA, NJ, OR, IL, VA, PA, FL, CO, AZ, KS, MD, MN, ND, MI, MO, WI, OH, UT, IN, TN, SC, AR, CT, NV, DC, NH, IA, KY, NE, DE, HI, ID, WY, OK, AL, RI, LA, VT, NM, PR, WV, AK, SD. Source observations may include different locations or revisions, not independent events or unique people. Entity matching may be incomplete; this does not establish that no notices were filed or no changes occurred.

    Ask the employer: Do any of the work locations in these records relate to this role, and can you clarify the current status of the team and worksite?

    See records: Current team and worksite changes

    • State WARN layoff notices · CA · 2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24 · Loaded 2026-08-28 — https://edd.ca.gov/en/jobs_and_training/layoff_services_warn/

Current sponsorship, pay, hiring plans and policy for a specific role remain unverified. Loaded dates identify our data version, not a human review date. For advice on an individual immigration case, consult a qualified professional.

This page combines 2 filing names

how we grouped them

This page groups the filing names listed below. Grouping may differ across sources and does not establish which legal entity would employ or petition for you.

Show the filing names behind this page
Name as filedFEIN (last 4)Filings
Microsoft Corporation444250,648

Showing the 1 most common of 2 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else Microsoft Corporation appears on this site

by filing volume

Roles. Microsoft Corporation is among the top filers for Software Engineer, Product Manager, Program Manager, Data Scientist, Hardware Engineer, Data Engineer, Site Reliability Engineer and Electrical Engineer. Those pages show the median filed wage for the role across all employers.

Places. It is among the top filers in Redmond, WA, Bellevue, WA, Mountain View, CA, Atlanta, GA, Irving, TX, Austin, TX, Charlotte, NC and Issaquah, WA. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in WA with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

AI Squared (9) · Auth0, Inc. (9) · Bamboo Technologies, Inc. (9) · CHISON USA Inc. (9) · Clallam County Public Hospital District 2 (9) · Cogent Healthcare of Montana, PC (9) · Community Health Center of Snohomish County (9) · EcoFlow Technology Inc. (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in WA are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.