The Sponsor File

Northeastern Conference Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists

Filing address: Jamaica, NYworksites: NY, MA, CT

  1. Change-of-employer denials
    not covered
    USCIS · FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3)
    No USCIS petition records under this name.
  2. Median filed wage
    too few filings
    DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · n = 1 certified
    Too few certified filings for a median.
  3. Green-card (PERM) filings
    none on record
    DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
    What we found, not missing data.
  4. Layoff notices (WARN)
    Not covered for NY, MA, CT
    State WARN · none of these states loaded
    Missing data, not a clean record.

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

No USCIS petition records are on file for this employer.Our USCIS coverage is FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3). Employers appear here only once USCIS has decided at least one H-1B petition filed under this name.

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.
Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Not enough certified filings to report a reliable median. The best year on record is FY2021 with n = 9; we require at least 10.
Fiscal yearFiled wageFilings (n)CertifiedWithdrawnDenied
FY2022$55,770 · 1 filing1100
FY20219 filings — too few for a median9902

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+6.2%
n = 10certified filings

Filed wages sit 6.2% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filedFilings (n)Filed wagePrevailing wageDifference
Level I10$55,770 · median of 10$52,490 · median of 10+6.2%

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
No PERM applications on record for this employer across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3). This is what we found, not missing data.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices
We have no way to know whether this company has had layoffs.
Layoff notices (WARN) are published state by state, and we have loaded only CA. This employer's H-1B worksites are in NY, MA, CT — none of which we have.

This blank does not mean the company has had no layoffs — it means we do not have those states' data. Check each state labor department's WARN page directly.

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

Where else Northeastern Conference Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists appears on this site

by filing volume

Places. It is among the top filers in Queens, NY and New Rochelle, NY. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in NY with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

13 Rattles Inc (9) · 400 Capital Management LLC (9) · 8 Tuxedos Inc. (9) · A. O. Fox Memorial Hospital (9) · A Partnership, Inc. (9) · A.R.T. Advisors, LLC (9) · Acara Solutions, Inc. (9) · Access Physical Therapy Wellness Rockland, PLLC (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in NY are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.