The Sponsor File

Stubhub, Inc.

Filing address: New York, NYworksites: NY, CA, GA, HI

  1. Change-of-employer denials
    0%
    USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined · n = 26 decided
  2. Median filed wage
    $207,500
    DOL LCA · FY2025 · n = 32 certified
  3. Green-card (PERM) filings
    17
    DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
  4. Layoff notices (WARN)
    3 on record
    State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

0%
n = 26petitions decided · FY2021–FY2025 combined

You are changing employers. That is the share of petitions like yours that Stubhub, Inc. had denied over the 5 fiscal years FY2021–FY2025 taken together — not in any single year. 26 change-of-employer petitions were decided across those years; 0 were denied. The year-by-year split is in the second table below. USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

The table below splits petitions by filing type, over FY2021–FY2025 combined. The types do not face the same odds — find the row that matches your own situation.

All figures in this table are FY2021–FY2025 combined totals.
Filing typeApprovedDeniednDenied share
Change of employerYou move from another company to this one260260%
New employmentFirst-time H-1B — subject to the annual lottery320320%
ContinuationExtending an H-1B you already hold here3033 decisions
AmendedA change at the same employer4044 decisions
Change with same employerNew role, same employer000
New concurrentA second, simultaneous H-1B000

Where fewer than 20 petitions were decided we print the count instead of a percentage. A percentage drawn from a handful of cases reads like a probability, and it is not one. How the sample thresholds are set.

Year by year, change-of-employer petitions only. The headline above combines the FY2021–FY2025 rows of this table (marked in window); the other years are shown because the denial climate in earlier years was not the same one.

Change of employer, by fiscal year.
Fiscal yearApprovedDeniednDenied shareWindow
FY2026 (through Q3)1401414 decisions
FY20257077 decisionsin window
FY20244044 decisionsin window
FY20238088 decisionsin window
FY20225055 decisionsin window
FY20212022 decisionsin window
FY20205055 decisions
FY2019240240%
FY20181101111 decisions
FY20171401414 decisions
FY2016200200%
FY20151711818 decisions
FY20141201212 decisions
FY2013330330%
FY2012201215%
FY20116066 decisions
FY20104044 decisions
FY20091011 decision

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Headline window FY2021–FY2025 combined · Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.
Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

Why 5 years combined, and why these 5?

A single year of one employer's petitions is often a handful of cases, and a percentage drawn from a handful reads like a probability. Combining fiscal years raises the count — but only if the years belong to the same period. Across all employers in our data, the share of change-of-employer petitions denied ran at 9.54% in FY2018, 9.42% in FY2019 and 4.99% in FY2020, and has stayed between 1.28% and 1.99% in every one of the 5 years from FY2021 through FY2025. Averaging the earlier years together with FY2025 would not produce a steadier estimate; it would produce a number that describes no period at all. So the window stops where the earlier adjudication climate begins, and every figure drawn from it is labelled with the years it covers.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
$207,500
n = 32certified filings

FY2025 median, from 32 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2025

Fiscal yearFiled wageFilings (n)CertifiedWithdrawnDenied
FY2026 (through Q3)$220,000 · median of 303030120
FY2025$207,500 · median of 32323260
FY2024$195,000 · median of 18181860
FY2023$190,000 · median of 20202070
FY2022$181,138 · median of 10101010
FY2021$142,450 · median of 10101000

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

Pay for this company’s largest job title

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Only this job title has enough filings to break out — 10 certified filings is the threshold, and this employer's other 8 titles are below it.

Job titleFiled wageWage sample (n)
Software Engineer
By seniority (6)

Level 2: $210,000 · median of 10
(unstated): 8 filings — too few for a median
Senior: 5 filings — too few for a median
Level 1: 4 filings — too few for a median
Level 3: 4 filings — too few for a median
Staff: 4 filings — too few for a median

$200,000
median of 35
35
Product Manager
By seniority (2)

Senior: 5 filings — too few for a median
(unstated): $270,000 · 1 filing


6 filings — too few for a median
6
Site Reliability Engineer
By seniority (2)

Staff: 2 filings — too few for a median
Senior: $250,000 · 1 filing


3 filings — too few for a median
3
Data Engineer
By seniority (2)

Level 2: $225,000 · 1 filing
Senior: $220,000 · 1 filing


2 filings — too few for a median
2
Project Manager
By seniority (1)

(unstated): 2 filings — too few for a median


2 filings — too few for a median
2
Data Analyst
By seniority (1)

(unstated): $130,000 · 1 filing

$130,000
1 filing
1
Data Scientist
By seniority (1)

(unstated): $120,000 · 1 filing

$120,000
1 filing
1
Financial Analyst
By seniority (1)

(unstated): $108,872 · 1 filing

$108,872
1 filing
1
Machine Learning Engineer
By seniority (1)

Senior: $159,000 · 1 filing

$159,000
1 filing
1

Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Wages are medians of certified filings; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Basis certified filings with a stated wage; medians, not averages

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+47.2%
n = 120certified filings

Filed wages sit 47.2% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filedFilings (n)Filed wagePrevailing wageDifference
Level I13$165,000 · median of 13$85,197 · median of 13+93.7%
Level II35$180,000 · median of 35$115,918 · median of 35+55.3%
Level III25$185,000 · median of 25$145,246 · median of 25+27.4%
Level IV44$250,000 · median of 44$169,229 · median of 44+47.7%
Not stated on the filing33 filings — too few for a median3 filings — too few for a median

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Yes — PERM filings on record

17 permanent labor certification applications were decided across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 11 of them in FY2026 (through Q3).

Fiscal yearCertifiedCertified-expiredDeniedWithdrawnTotal
FY2026 (through Q3)1010011
FY202520013
FY202301001
FY202111002

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices
Notice dateEffectiveFiled asTypeEmployees
2022-11-012022-12-31StubHub,Closure Permanent9
2020-05-282020-06-06StubHubLayoff123
2020-01-222020-01-23StubHubLayoff93

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This page combines 5 filing names

how we grouped them

One company files under many spellings and many legal entities. We combine them so the numbers above cover the whole company rather than one spelling of it — and we list what we combined, so you can check the grouping instead of taking our word for it.

Show the filing names behind this page
Name as filedFEIN (last 4)Filings
STUBHUB, INC.601886
StubHub, Inc.601864
StubHub,inc.60182

Showing the 3 most common of 5 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else Stubhub, Inc. appears on this site

by filing volume

This employer does not rank among the largest filers on any city or role page, so it is not listed on one. That is about filing volume, not about whether it sponsors.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in NY with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

13 Rattles Inc (9) · 400 Capital Management LLC (9) · 8 Tuxedos Inc. (9) · A. O. Fox Memorial Hospital (9) · A Partnership, Inc. (9) · A.R.T. Advisors, LLC (9) · Acara Solutions, Inc. (9) · Access Physical Therapy Wellness Rockland, PLLC (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in NY are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.