The Sponsor File

Visa U.S.A. Inc.

Filing address: Foster City, CApart of Visaworksites: CA, TX, CO, NY, GA (5 of 20 states)

  1. Change-of-employer denials
    0.9%
    USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined · n = 336 decided
  2. Median filed wage
    $141,751
    DOL LCA · FY2025 · n = 458 certified
  3. Green-card (PERM) filings
    173
    DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
  4. Layoff notices (WARN)
    No CA records
    State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24
    Worksites in TX, CO, NY, GA, FL and 14 other states — not covered.

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

0.9%
n = 336petitions decided · FY2021–FY2025 combined

You are changing employers. That is the share of petitions like yours that Visa U.S.A. Inc. had denied over the 5 fiscal years FY2021–FY2025 taken together — not in any single year. 336 change-of-employer petitions were decided across those years; 3 were denied. The year-by-year split is in the second table below. USCIS · FY2021–FY2025 combined

FY2025 alone: 5%. FY2021–FY2025 combined: 0.9%.

The table below splits petitions by filing type, over FY2021–FY2025 combined. The types do not face the same odds — find the row that matches your own situation.

All figures in this table are FY2021–FY2025 combined totals.
Filing typeApprovedDeniednDenied share
Change of employerYou move from another company to this one33333360.9%
New employmentFirst-time H-1B — subject to the annual lottery33143351.2%
ContinuationExtending an H-1B you already hold here74897571.2%
AmendedA change at the same employer14711480.7%
Change with same employerNew role, same employer260260%
New concurrentA second, simultaneous H-1B000

Where fewer than 20 petitions were decided we print the count instead of a percentage. A percentage drawn from a handful of cases reads like a probability, and it is not one. How the sample thresholds are set.

Year by year, change-of-employer petitions only. The headline above combines the FY2021–FY2025 rows of this table (marked in window); the other years are shown because the denial climate in earlier years was not the same one.

Change of employer, by fiscal year.
Fiscal yearApprovedDeniednDenied shareWindow
FY2026 (through Q3)1801818 decisions
FY2025402425%in window
FY2024410410%in window
FY2023591602%in window
FY202214201420.0%in window
FY2021510510%in window
FY2020482504%
FY2019731741%
FY2018740740%
FY20171901919 decisions
FY20161711818 decisions
FY2015360360%
FY2014250250%
FY2013270270%
FY2012260260%
FY2011200200%
FY20101101111 decisions
FY20095055 decisions

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Headline window FY2021–FY2025 combined · Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.
Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

Why 5 years combined, and why these 5?

A single year of one employer's petitions is often a handful of cases, and a percentage drawn from a handful reads like a probability. Combining fiscal years raises the count — but only if the years belong to the same period. Across all employers in our data, the share of change-of-employer petitions denied ran at 9.54% in FY2018, 9.42% in FY2019 and 4.99% in FY2020, and has stayed between 1.28% and 1.99% in every one of the 5 years from FY2021 through FY2025. Averaging the earlier years together with FY2025 would not produce a steadier estimate; it would produce a number that describes no period at all. So the window stops where the earlier adjudication climate begins, and every figure drawn from it is labelled with the years it covers.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
$141,751
n = 458certified filings

FY2025 median, from 458 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2025

Fiscal yearFiled wageFilings (n)CertifiedWithdrawnDenied
FY2026 (through Q3)$153,700 · median of 283283283121
FY2025$141,751 · median of 45845846060
FY2024$132,900 · median of 43143143132
FY2023$130,800 · median of 41841841850
FY2022$120,869 · median of 509509509121
FY2021$112,492 · median of 344344344130

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

What this company pays by job title

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Job titleFiled wageWage sample (n)
Data Scientist
across 3 seniority levels: $110,600 – $138,649
By seniority (5)

(unstated): $110,600 · median of 106
Senior: $138,500 · median of 96
Staff: $138,649 · median of 12
Principal: 2 filings — too few for a median
Level 4: $150,000 · 1 filing

$126,277
median of 217
217
Product Manager
across 2 seniority levels: $123,000 – $147,700
By seniority (6)

Senior: $147,700 · median of 83
(unstated): $123,000 · median of 51
Associate: 7 filings — too few for a median
Staff: 7 filings — too few for a median
Lead: $110,800 · 1 filing
Principal: $117,700 · 1 filing

$135,149
median of 150
150
Software Engineer
across 3 seniority levels: $92,040 – $139,464
By seniority (4)

(unstated): $92,040 · median of 21
Senior: $108,826 · median of 18
Staff: $139,464 · median of 13
Lead: $108,000 · 1 filing

$113,443
median of 53
53
Data Engineer
across 2 seniority levels: $114,750 – $138,500
By seniority (3)

Senior: $114,750 · median of 26
Staff: $138,500 · median of 15
(unstated): 2 filings — too few for a median

$123,968
median of 43
43
Machine Learning Engineer
By seniority (2)

Staff: $135,845 · median of 35
Senior: 4 filings — too few for a median

$132,475
median of 39
39
Financial Analyst
By seniority (2)

Senior: $120,411 · median of 15
(unstated): 9 filings — too few for a median

$111,150
median of 24
24
Business Analyst
By seniority (2)

Senior: $119,957 · median of 14
(unstated): 4 filings — too few for a median

$110,198
median of 18
18
Systems Analyst
By seniority (3)

Senior: $147,068 · median of 11
(unstated): 3 filings — too few for a median
Level 4: $134,800 · 1 filing

$140,284
median of 15
15
Consultant
By seniority (1)

Senior: $144,036 · median of 12

$144,036
median of 12
12
Program Manager
By seniority (2)

(unstated): 5 filings — too few for a median
Senior: 3 filings — too few for a median


8 filings — too few for a median
8

Showing the 10 largest of 14 job titles this employer filed for. This list is truncated, not complete.

Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Wages are medians of certified filings; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Basis certified filings with a stated wage; medians, not averages

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+8%
n = 2,443certified filings

Filed wages sit 8% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filedFilings (n)Filed wagePrevailing wageDifference
Level I85$87,800 · median of 85$73,694 · median of 85+19.1%
Level II755$110,000 · median of 755$95,555 · median of 755+15.1%
Level III373$126,000 · median of 373$120,370 · median of 373+4.7%
Level IV1,054$149,989 · median of 1,054$141,378 · median of 1,054+6.1%
Marked not applicable1$208,000 · 1 filing$208,000 · 1 filing
Not stated on the filing175$137,062 · median of 175$135,107 · median of 175+1.4%

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Yes — PERM filings on record

173 permanent labor certification applications were decided across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 17 of them in FY2026 (through Q3).

Fiscal yearCertifiedCertified-expiredDeniedWithdrawnTotal
FY2026 (through Q3)1520017
FY20255962010131
FY20242100425

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices
No California WARN notices on record for this employer (2018-11-15 to 2026-08-24). That part is a real zero, not missing data. But this employer also has worksites in TX, CO, NY, GA, FL, and we have not loaded those states — layoffs there would not show up here.

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This page combines 5 filing names

how we grouped them

One company files under many spellings and many legal entities. We combine them so the numbers above cover the whole company rather than one spelling of it — and we list what we combined, so you can check the grouping instead of taking our word for it.

Show the filing names behind this page
Name as filedFEIN (last 4)Filings
Visa U.S.A. Inc.16942,443
Visa U.S.A Inc.33
Visa U.S.A. Inc19
Visa U.S.A Inc5

Showing the 4 most common of 5 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else Visa U.S.A. Inc. appears on this site

by filing volume

Roles. Visa U.S.A. Inc. is among the top filers for Data Scientist, Product Manager and Financial Analyst. Those pages show the median filed wage for the role across all employers.

Places. It is among the top filers in Foster City, CA, Austin, TX, Highlands Ranch, CO, Miami, FL, Mentor, OH, Ashburn, VA, San Fransisco, CA and Holyoke, MA. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in CA with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

11x AI Inc. (9) · ABC Technologies California, LLC (9) · Accurate Engineering, Inc. (9) · Achievekids (9) · Acies Engineering, Inc. (9) · ACORE Capital Mortgage, LP. (9) · Acquest law Inc. (9) · Adicet Bio, Inc. (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in CA are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.