Yanka Industries, Inc.

Filing address: San Francisco, CAworksites: CA, WA, TX, NJ, NY (5 of 6 states)

Change-of-employer denials
not covered
USCIS · FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3)
No USCIS petition records under this name.
Median filed wage
$145,000
DOL LCA · FY2022 · n = 11 certified
Green-card (PERM) filings
16
DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)
Layoff notices (WARN)
1 on record
State WARN · CA only · through 2026-08-24

Reported wages are what the employer filed with the Department of Labor — not actual take-home pay. Denials reflect individual case outcomes — not whether an employer sponsors. One LCA is not one job.

If this company files an H-1B for you, how often is it denied?

Not to be confused with LCA outcomes. An LCA is a Department of Labor filing that precedes the visa petition; nearly every employer's LCAs are certified at 99–100%, which tells you almost nothing about petition outcomes. The figures on this page come from USCIS petition decisions instead. The two are often reported interchangeably; they measure different things. Why these are two different datasets.

No USCIS petition records are on file for this employer.Our USCIS coverage is FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3). Employers appear here only once USCIS has decided at least one H-1B petition filed under this name.

Source USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub (I-129 petition decisions) ·Coverage FY2009–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This is the only place on this site where the word "denial" refers to a visa decision. These figures come from USCIS decisions on H-1B petitions (Form I-129). A denial reflects the outcome of one specific petition and depends on the role, the filing type, the year's adjudication climate, and the case's own facts. A high denial rate does not mean an employer will not sponsor you, and a low one does not guarantee your petition will be approved.

Why separate "change of employer" from "new employment"?

They are different processes. A first-time petition must clear the annual lottery; a change of employer does not take a lottery slot. Averaging them into one "denial rate" hands the job-changer a number that is too high. The gap is systematic across employers, not a quirk of any one of them — which is why the headline above uses the change-of-employer figure rather than a blended one.

What this company files as the wage for H-1B roles

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

$145,000

n = 11certified filings

FY2022 median, from 11 certified filings. DOL LCA · FY2022

Fiscal year	Filed wage	Filings (n)	Certified	Withdrawn
FY2026 (through Q3)	6 filings — too few for a median	6	6	4
FY2025	3 filings — too few for a median	3	3	1
FY2024	6 filings — too few for a median	6	6	6
FY2023	4 filings — too few for a median	4	4	7
FY2022	$145,000 · median of 11	11	11	9
FY2021	$170,000 · median of 13	13	13	0

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; records whose wage unit is clearly mis-entered are excluded ·how wages are computed

These figures come from Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) the employer filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. They are the base wage the employer committed to pay — they exclude bonuses, equity, and other compensation, and they do not confirm what any individual was actually paid. A filing is not a hire.

A "denied" count near zero is normal here. The Department of Labor checks whether the form complies, not whether the person can get a visa. What decides that is the USCIS petition — the module above.

Pay for this company’s largest job title

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Job title	Filed wage	Wage sample (n)
Software Engineer By seniority (3) Level 2: 3 filings — too few for a median Senior: 2 filings — too few for a median Staff: 2 filings — too few for a median	7 filings — too few for a median	7
Data Engineer By seniority (2) (unstated): 3 filings — too few for a median Senior: 3 filings — too few for a median	6 filings — too few for a median	6
Product Manager By seniority (2) Senior: 2 filings — too few for a median Principal: $224,000 · 1 filing	3 filings — too few for a median	3
Data Scientist By seniority (1) Staff: $220,000 · 1 filing	$220,000 1 filing	1

Titles come from the job title as filed, reduced to a known family — see how titles are grouped. Wages are medians of certified filings; a seniority breakdown is shown where the filing stated one.

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035) · Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) ·Basis certified filings with a stated wage; medians, not averages

Which wage tier this company files at

DOL LCA · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Every LCA names a prevailing wage — the government's reference rate for that job, in that place, at one of four experience tiers. Level I is entry-level; Level IV is the most senior. Two things matter here: which tier the employer files at, and how far above that reference it actually offers.

+17.7%

n = 43certified filings

Filed wages sit 17.7% above the prevailing wage for the same jobs and tiers. A figure near zero means the employer files at close to the government reference rate; a large one means it files well above.

Wage tier as filed	Filings (n)	Filed wage	Prevailing wage	Difference
Level II	7	7 filings — too few for a median	7 filings — too few for a median	—
Level III	15	$181,273 · median of 15	$145,246 · median of 15	+24.8%
Level IV	21	$179,000 · median of 21	$155,106 · median of 21	+15.4%

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC LCA disclosure files (ETA-9035, prevailing wage level as filed) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28 ·Basis certified filings only; medians, not averages

“Not stated” and “marked not applicable” are two different things and we keep them apart. A blank tier means the employer left the field empty; “not applicable” means the employer said the tiered scale does not fit the role. Folding either one into the numbered tiers would turn “we do not know” into “we do”.

A tier is not a judgement about the employer. Filing at Level I for a genuinely entry-level role is correct. What the table shows is where the company placed the role on the scale and what it committed to pay against that reference — nothing more.

Does this company file green card applications?

DOL PERM · FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3)

Yes — PERM filings on record

16 permanent labor certification applications were decided across FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3), 4 of them in FY2025.

Fiscal year	Certified	Certified-expired	Denied	Withdrawn	Total
FY2025	2	2	0	0	4
FY2024	0	3	0	1	4
FY2023	0	2	1	0	3
FY2022	0	2	0	1	3
FY2021	0	1	0	1	2

Source U.S. Department of Labor — OFLC PERM disclosure files (ETA-9089) ·Coverage FY2021–FY2026 (through Q3) · Updated 2026-08-28

"Certified-expired" is a common status, not a refusal. A labor certification is valid for a limited window; if the employer does not file the next step in time it expires. That is usually about process timing, not a failed application. We keep it in its own column — never folded into "denied", never into "certified".

We do not estimate anyone's prospects of getting a green card from these numbers.The people who file PERM and the people holding H-1B are not the same group, and years separate the two steps. The table above shows only what this employer actually filed and what was decided.

Any recent layoffs?

State WARN notices

Notice date	Effective	Filed as	Type	Employees
2023-02-28	2023-04-29	Yanka Industries,	Layoff Permanent	89

Source State WARN layoff notices ·States loaded CA (through 2026-08-24) ·Updated 2026-08-28

This page combines 6 filing names

how we grouped them

One company files under many spellings and many legal entities. We combine them so the numbers above cover the whole company rather than one spelling of it — and we list what we combined, so you can check the grouping instead of taking our word for it.

Show the filing names behind this page

Name as filed	FEIN (last 4)	Filings
Yanka Industries, Inc.	1412	66
Yanka Industries, Inc. d/b/a MasterClass	—	3
Yanka Industries Inc.	—	1

Showing the 3 most common of 6 filing names.

Different tax IDs in this list are normal — large companies file through several legal entities. We never group by tax ID alone: placeholder and mistyped IDs are common enough that doing so would merge unrelated companies. Grouping here comes from the filing names themselves, plus recorded human judgement where two entities are publicly one company.

Where else Yanka Industries, Inc. appears on this site

by filing volume

Places. It is among the top filers in Bee Cave, TX. Filings are counted by worksite, not by where the company is headquartered.

These are the city and role pages on which this employer ranks among the largest filers — not a complete list of everywhere it files.

Browse all cities and job titles, or read how filings are grouped.

Other employers in CA with too few filings for their own page

not ranked

These employers filed LCAs but have fewer than 10 certified records, which is not enough to build a page on. They are listed so that "not shown" never gets read as "does not sponsor".

11x AI Inc. (9) · ABC Technologies California, LLC (9) · Accurate Engineering, Inc. (9) · Achievekids (9) · Acies Engineering, Inc. (9) · ACORE Capital Mortgage, LP. (9) · Acquest law Inc. (9) · Adicet Bio, Inc. (9)

Showing the 8 with the most filings — 8+ employers in CA are below the threshold. This list is truncated, not complete.